From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: secure plist store Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:23:43 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87oc1fy0c0.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87sjrttwh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh4b9h9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aae05l8p.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87k4d4b66p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh0fh4g.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87y60ncma8.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87vcvrne02.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87r56ep3sm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o39n171.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87mxh0sy9o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqlwkfw1.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87fwmsr9iu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739isjxqw.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309437847 7198 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 12:44:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:44:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 14:44:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGbA-0006KV-WC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGb9-00086p-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:43:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGIx-0003k5-NS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGIv-0004Q3-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGIu-0004PO-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGIr-0005sU-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:25:05 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:25:05 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:25:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z3dGchqhzXep6NsqdqRoe94/Nbw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141220 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:31:03 +0900 Daiki Ueno wrote: DU> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I have one suggestion, that `epa-passphrase-callback-function' should >> take an extra detail string, as shown in my patch: DU> [...] >> Obviously that's not strictly needed since I can write my own function >> as you see. DU> epa-passphrase-callback-function is not an API, but an example DU> implementation of passphrase callback. So it is right to redefine it -- DU> you won't need (require 'epa) then. DU> Also, if you use only symmetric encryption, you can remove the DU> condition Y: (if (eq key-id 'SYM) X Y) Thanks, I'll do that. Ted