From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mitchel Humpherys Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:03 -0800 Message-ID: <87ob3um5r8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20140102095347.6834E381D0C@snark.thyrsus.com> <87fvp6bdd9.fsf_-_@ktab.red-bean.com> <87bnzufkct.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388698220 3595 80.91.229.3 (2 Jan 2014 21:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 22:30:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VypqU-0006Gk-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VypqT-0006Ee-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VypqK-0006C4-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VypqE-0007Gi-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:64363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VypqE-0007GA-Jg; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w10so14551395pde.7 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=dLV1XKhc6KhDONobHTk//7JKuO/O8fKqkFXVfIYVngU=; b=FTnoFXViMVJmm1fm3nd5n+ajUiPXadonUlOSUJB58RxYvfi+7OaRPbOZ/GZpX4Ar3E 3MCBpC8BszgoTEuWM7oPueG+AH5xSG2418j3YUVbq62otohqUc/E3fIUgK3ZM1WsDpzJ 77GzAicOMfWiW38bOFRnRWfYfssoU2Jyt0VeBFv4HRH1/D/7k2iWjo/CPdGh665lJkLk aSlmEAQPMJ6fPNWmNwXl9pSlUc2FE9/JQRLKHbixdGUIbGL6i5KhAAZnhNi7p0Oo9qYQ 3QsHDZ0wXsfgqz6mB1OfZw/PKHzY7BNRqL5/wHMM4dn2QiQ7cw4ef+r7PD1MFkMSlmYs 6ObA== X-Received: by 10.68.201.226 with SMTP id kd2mr5347024pbc.157.1388698207949; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from sonbuntu (ip72-197-240-81.sd.sd.cox.net. [72.197.240.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ki1sm104094793pbd.1.2014.01.02.13.30.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bnzufkct.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:56:34 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167087 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 02 2014 at 07:56:34 AM, Bastien wrote: > Karl Fogel writes: > >> Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS other than >> git? > > +1 for using Git. +1 I recently submitted my first (trivial) patch to Emacs. It was painful enough to deter me from making a few other changes that I've wanted to make recently... In contrast, I shoot off "drive-by" patches to third-party Elisp projects about once a week because it's dead simple with Git. I know that I could become proficient in bzr with a little effort but it's just not worth the time investment since there are only 2 or 3 projects that I care about using bzr, while everyone else is using git. -- Mitch