From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Make check in trunk Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:00:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87oaux94j4.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <83ppfef59r.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq9m813a.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83d2bef0wk.fsf@gnu.org> <87sika7zhx.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83a96hgax0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409688073 11884 80.91.229.3 (2 Sep 2014 20:01:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:01:13 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 02 22:01:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuGE-0001f0-5p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:01:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuGD-0008H3-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:01:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuFv-0008Gx-43 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuFm-0005bE-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuFl-0005aX-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XOuFg-0001K7-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:00:28 +0200 Original-Received: from 18.red-83-41-63.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.41.63.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:00:28 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 18.red-83-41-63.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:00:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 18.red-83-41-63.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jLytr3GDy1Nv9qfYprRJ3p/GVDw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173971 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> As mentioned, you have updates (MSYS2 maintainers are very quick at >> following upstream releases) and a 64 bit environment (something that >> MSYS/MinGW doesn't provide.) > > Why is it important to have a 64-bit environment in MSYS? (I'm not > talking about GCC and Binutils, I'm asking about MSYS itself.) I guess there is not much about it. Maybe it runs faster than a 32 bits MSYS on 64 bit OSes, but I have no data. The convenience of having MinGW-w64 64 bits along with MSYS2 (32 or 64) is a different matter, because the MSYS2 maintainers certainly will do whatever is in their power for ensuring a seamless MSYS2/MinGW-w64 experience.