From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Continuous integration Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:16 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87o9wq7i23.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87a88emy62.fsf@luca> <87k27h8ncd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737e5uoyd.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87d1d8ul7q.fsf@russet.org.uk> <22740.454.818489.461885@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87h92jswrk.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83246C10-FB82-4BE0-80F7-A56F9A12951C@gmail.com> <87bmsrc64p.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490373113 9522 195.159.176.226 (24 Mar 2017 16:31:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:31:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 24 17:31:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7t-0001Dh-Cu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:31:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7u-0000Cr-Gz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7o-0000CY-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7k-0001B5-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=54593 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7k-0001AF-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crS7V-00083l-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:31:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:OmYmmbRZAkTvy2u10SyN6VkKFqg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213302 Archived-At: On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:37:42 +0000 phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) wrote: PL> Ultimately, if our main criteria for a CI and code review system is PL> "does it work with EWW" or "can we have an emacs interface", then I PL> think that it's likely we are going to end up with something that is PL> poorly functional. Picking a good system and then making Emacs work with PL> it seems a better way forward. Agreed; it's probably going to be possible to use the GitLab API. It's pretty thorough https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/README.html Ted