From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jens Lechtenboerger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuPG homedir and package.el? Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:01:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87o9wggrbl.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> References: <87zih1gfjh.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> <87k27rejkw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lgs2esh6.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> <87k27k9iil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874lynsv2p.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> <87bmso8oyt.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491055362 1187 195.159.176.226 (1 Apr 2017 14:02:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 14:02:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 16:02:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuJbv-0007y6-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:02:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuJc0-000108-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:02:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuJau-0000wH-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuJar-0006Rh-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.215]:43176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuJar-0006Qp-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5312D44F75 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:01:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id NQ8EeTVTapS5 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:01:20 +0200 (CEST) OpenPGP: id=0xA142FD84; url=https://www.informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de/A142FD84.asc Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87bmso8oyt.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> (Jens Lechtenboerger's message of "Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:41:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.241.60.215 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213578 Archived-At: On 2017-03-26, at 09:41, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote: > On 2017-03-20, at 18:43, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote: > >> On 2017-03-20, at 09:37, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> >>> The defcustom you introduced is the missing piece for more >>> advanced users, so I think that resolves the issue for everyone. I hope >>> you agree. >> >> I agree that this resolves the issue. > > As there doesn't seem to be any objection, could somebody please > apply the patch? I just created an account on savannah and requested inclusion for emacs. How do people go about changing etc/NEWS and manual pages? Should the small changes required in this case be discussed here? Those changes of documentation are sometimes introduced as separate commits, sometimes combined with the code change. What is preferred? Best wishes Jens