From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 26.2 RC1 is out! Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87o964kl4p.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87o965nq4q.fsf@petton.fr> <87ftrgod5o.fsf@petton.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="135031"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rgm@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 21 21:54:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h74iE-000Yws-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:54:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h74i8-0004hb-H4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h74gj-0004c4-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h74dr-0004c0-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:50:24 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:39258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h74dq-0004YL-Ny; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:50:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1553201419; bh=DaP/tuipUSuYvyGwYbCMFc3rmKkXLYeoSWnL7ghWX7A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JiSDenJsOzi87nGjSCqtg2lGd5VmBfL3wwbolEYX3sxgHCnw/GY7aZqGYdp8iXehFG4vJrdZe0KJ9rEgWySFcZqgEgYdkB5aGBuOnjUg6U5fC5aK3gx7Dn+bTv8qTZG/mHhWa6/HlVFHgwegnRC6J8Qn6859/RbQ+hHz8JHzfR0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234486 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Andy Moreton writes: >> As it is a release candidate, the tarball contains some changes related >> to the Emacs version being 26.2 and its release date (currently set to >> the 27th) that should not be pushed yet. I'm putting Glenn in Cc, I believe he wrote that part of the documentation. > A tarball for distribution should not contain anything that has not > been committed to version control. I agree with that, but it's not the current process as described in admin/make-tarball.txt. I'm fine with tagging RCs and pushing files with unreleased version numbers, but then I will adjust the content of make-tarball.txt. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1AWqLIYsVPF+7mvg6LzXhmr8+XgFAlyT+QYACgkQ6LzXhmr8 +XgDqAf/VbZLQt73VEpuCCMVcwZvNppkNt62FhEgwDUrxBrZN/ROxdaTn+LMiIHc jj3YU9L1IZ0eBpaQY3R4KMb8pSjyDBUoQ0NwaaXRm6JO+SSON+fdwjkqeaLlgqtq APqzl6gixzXEGM7RGnQmHw3O/27ZirEgWbfngc3+TMywkr7SUMeFpSZLYuzmphgq bum3zVzOaycQE+ds1V+8SEjdgP69L+6+L/EctP69ycdPZQHw3mWcqItHNjJrfpe+ qBnv1AokmW+VBE5AV5dOuBFiUzASza95AU0TMy/KBxVzL4f0xEGvqcM9LQQgZuyM +gQddsy1Ezk6hveDB0po0n8pcc17aQ== =v93E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--