From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8ggcba0.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <878s7m1mo3.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft1u9xhh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87o8giz61u.fsf@gnus.org> <87blchzo9b.fsf@gnus.org> <875z2pu0as.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Doug Davis , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 16:57:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD89m-0005LS-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:57:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD89k-0004ka-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:57:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD7xY-0006pY-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:58828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD7xV-00029l-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8011B7A6C; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1613749481; bh=vRzmhCQ5DOe0toosJ24nxhlb sGZZmFQZnZukD82JWyw=; b=MQKcfsUdZp4BdcS1GVmJ6UpOCReemGHsDiC5djro pXoVd3k6xWqLqssLbNS+K59ISrL207AJ85yC1DhkDhTHAE3C5IRH7dPV6ZOYWDNE CvXaIXk4EJhAtAWLhYr7NFwW4PHDMcDnD+x0wx4lVXRXQL6ordsj7CAPa5OMpdff FoE= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id qyuJuCfL8b6g; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CFE1B7A6F; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265269 Archived-At: >> Jonas (CC'd) proposed Transient for inclusion to GNU ELPA 10 months >> ago[1]; afair the thread got derailed because of namespacing issues? This time around the timing is very good. This week I have been working on getting Transient ready for another release and was already planning to publish that to GNU Elpa today. And then I saw this thread, while drinking my morning tea. :D > For some reason, Jonas hasn't considered it "ready enough" to make a > *release*, yet. Maybe Jonas can remind me/us what are the missing > elements. I probably was worried about the heisenbug, that I have not been able to track down until earlier this week. Also I didn't want to publish until I was able to building the package locally before publishing it on GNU Elpa. Now that you have rewritten the GNU Elpa tooling that works well (thanks again), so that no longer is a blocker. (We still have to look into making org-contrib and my ox-texinfo+ available while building packages, but that can wait.) So if everything goes according to plan, I will release later today, or maybe on the weekend. Jonas