From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/rcirc-update] Reconnects don't seem to work anymore Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:54:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8c6fls8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871r98af1n.fsf@gnu.org> <877dj0wtwr.fsf@posteo.net> <87y2bg8y0k.fsf@gnu.org> <871r938u3v.fsf@gnu.org> <8735tjxft7.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgvqykkv.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmwmx0gl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.13; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 16 06:59:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltNeD-0001TD-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:59:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59530 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltNeC-000221-Dh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltNdO-0001An-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltNdN-0004Gv-UA; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:46591) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltNdN-0003dH-Rt; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9670427C0054; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:35 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedvkedgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheple ekueeuiefhvdfhudeuheegtdeghfeglefhtdefhfeihfdvieevtdeliedutdeinecuffho mhgrihhnpehfrhgvvghnohguvgdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhorhhnodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshho nhgrlhhithihqdekieejfeekjeekgedqieefhedvleekqdhtshguhheppehgnhhurdhorh hgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:58:34 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87pmwmx0gl.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270831 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: Hi Philip, >> Yes, only freenode and only since today with no changes on rcirc in >> the meantime. When I do >> >> /msg nickserv help >> >> in the *chat.freenode.org* buffer, I get the response >> >> 20:42 *** 401 n No such nick >> >> and in the buffer N@chat.freenode.org there is >> >> 20:42 ickserv help > > This was an issue caused by the new rcirc-define-command macro. The > intention was to improve defun-rcirc-command by adding integrated > argument parsing, and in this case, the regular expression was nor > correctly generated, as it did not require at least one whitespace > between arguments. I hope the last commits have fixes those issues, > but I might have to rethink some more fundamental things about how > that macro works. I'm now on 1181c606b3 but still "/msg nickservx test" will message "ickservx test" to the user N on libera.chat. I'd much prefer if that told me that there is no (online) user nickservx rather than messaging some mostly random stranger. >> 2. I should look into using SASL for identificiation. > > Part of the IRCv3 improvements should also include this. Great. Bye, Tassilo