From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87o89hh1oh.fsf@gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2340"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , danflscr@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Eli Zaretskii , Drew DeVault To: Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 20:20:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK2wr-0000Ms-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:20:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK2wp-0006ag-NT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK2vy-0005oN-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:34952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK2vw-0000d1-Og; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:20:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XMOO9+9jZ9F7aL54hHYMrdIK2t+3pWV6vWnYPjENQc4=; b=A/QkyyRCA8eda6dW/bDH0Gfpd3 4zaLRWUdA8KvKPQSNamZff0Ng4bF1gfjsF08iHppUNkUgVRFnHGRJ3oHIiDJzgYAtkcgV33nnbw+r v/ex0lFswSonD+7cggx949BDccYKO6o9M9tPjYNauqLpWQbYgsT7zIJEXSzTPMeTLFMY=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK2vg-0006WB-9z; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:19:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("Daniel =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn=22's?= message of "Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:08:37 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273346 Archived-At: Daniel Mart=C3=ADn writes: > For people that don't want to use the Web interface, the usage of git > send-mail may pose some problems. In CONTRIBUTE there is a note that > says that patch attachments are preferred to git send-mail for some > reasons: Well, we really don't care as long as the patches reach us unscathed. In my experience, it's more likely that a patch won't be mangled if it's in an attachment (which is why CONTRIBUTE says that), but if you have a setup that allows you to send patches safely otherwise (i.e., you're not using Gmail :-)), then we don't care. > But even if patch attachments are not supported by sourcehut, I think > support for image attachments is at least required for some issues. Yeah, it has to support attachments. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no