From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contradictiory directions Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:24:05 +0800 Message-ID: <87o85iqi7u.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <20211211035614.15517.53830@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211211035616.984DD20A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87ee6j4ty4.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735mz4o70.fsf@yahoo.com> <83k0gbr0dm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y24r33bn.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ilvu1ldh.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6h5tap6.fsf@gnus.org> <87tufbu7jg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y24nr6nk.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf0ntz0t.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wnk6mjlm.fsf@gnus.org> <877dc6tjz0.fsf_-_@yahoo.com> <871r2e5g4u.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34452"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 11:26:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxRUR-0008lP-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:26:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59704 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxRUQ-0002PT-Cn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:26:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxRSO-0008Q5-JD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic314-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.189.146]:36920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxRSL-0005xm-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:24:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1639563856; bh=rfxHJxEOX+0fkjTIO6FP/EizpYompngqAByJv7z+FA4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=qo4LpYAoluEbJ6846M4kFN3rp6rJEePgT+62qzM2Z44ftM7whjWnOUhPolqVr0gvYogymECh9V0ggYg0sDdH1cFDZtnTnI/UMqi/qEftUm2PZaBGa0fLhKUonwT0Y5w975vojdV28dFosNn/VhBg66NNtH2TwkpM7rNr1v0YmDcuVtLjHo6ApqfptVWYMLMCsLVjCiw9kyRi7i51hWw5ZKvDM3/dncjvJxunaX9QfIXI3YDsUQknOtz8bdYrZG8c6WA2t3iuQ4uSlvKrdtkbibpCA1gQ/4VzUHsPOJW87lFJ0yhdcZCEFuTSCjvSlAHIKvQka2AUxDnMcwWJAi1Gpw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1639563856; bh=P8mF2nJcHilNzb9EN9jOKN6Y+dezoYGhbD3ZID72vte=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=oQvcwwGtvM+SapKNgx3c8TlnkcPlthBdblxLDxOVMz3MCTymhKndJ/KKeUSyAi0+Ed/imBJqCbaoU5UxQjUs++gEjO/uyZaxLn6Z7mbF7OMi0Gud18B8ouGHVfGO1wa8/ESl5H+Er1IKq9m+fMHCPDvRQl1fA3s8U4Bo35ymWFD8hZb5fzF2SFaEpmGZYSl/6O+3IjPRJ3FIMac1emvrbIEp0v0dbvf7IJ0GoylKpwBZ27tVfYnnsh+5O/Yn7Zzdm6IPoN0AbDOD60mumpInHzL1OgxPSGNxP4oB5JlZwbkVH4xQfzCsX00wj6XH2k8ejEDgV3KLpmX1449o5yJW+g== X-YMail-OSG: FBK9aGUVM1nUbQFt0B7sBkhuQtgTAMNMuGh4U5ja8UG9OpQROWUbrKxrm81AfZk HRF6sDqBaO.ic4NtcCohqfVQ2Scs7TlKxkvoAyrfjph2oMT4Eh1C199tb62j2.ZmBbOgp4TOcj8l iIjzYfanHUNmr_T7tMjZ52up1IxDzBAxFrWs24MZ3fZmNzEGpxvxGEaQQTntQyUt5WuMcnMUN5Rr wTav9AVWH9PEXoPZ7s2kV9tRTaLGM2evTQ1nQFiNdhSu2oLHfNLsd_b16fVxgIwevxBp0CY37VUw lI6A5Vs4Z7GbtP2lv.RAFV3nPJCpPlIvNwGPI1gSRXrJ9CutIew7wVhqtBPo77kbo8nZJbRuyfZ7 AbJZjBRJtohs8KQx.2skOaDY49NjrpVPIeh6o_uHkn8kLwHA30gARF447szlbUq05uyoTzZ6rJgL 2E4Yp75xZdaeragkkFIWBQgguchEJbgtr_fb9lzo9HWpZJuLL4duBmDCD9egGsSuctex2xz22S7f J.81_V_ISQThiEFiHST9KZA7Wuz_8Z4678Zal2BbzqPCqyMb3_WVQOp1YCkpVqCvyljfXeZbxnnM KCxQn.hy1_E8xwctWX9N2FX9tF1kVY85g9plEkLR4Yq_MqSjraUoXCFhhGgQlAy.H0qle6uEx3Xs 8GFnjKSgcK4t4e_nmknzSKN7_7q9_30fDFtIOc2r2Z1zGuC.QOa8mvgzCB6o5xTPuUh99afMKZ1P mYok3PQEOjzYiMdwrRAuPvoSwRo3Sfw.l7xZtkA2PjSmRlCkXqqjyQSjz1YtOac_TgKDdacWPA18 8TfCmR8EVU58VENR0m5s.pt_7P77icvTm3fGTd_5Lg X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:24:16 +0000 Original-Received: by kubenode514.mail-prod1.omega.sg3.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID dc9d04db580ee54f88a2223fded42e14; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:24:09 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <871r2e5g4u.fsf@telefonica.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:14:41 +0100") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19415 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.189.146; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic314-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282007 Archived-At: =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: > Propietary modules can define any symbol, so the > "this_module_is_fine_with_gnus" or whatever trick is used on Emacs and > gcc modules is even less of a solution. I can foresee a propietary > module playing that trick, but changing the name of the module and > creating a name collision with some of the most popular modules out > there is a bit too risky even for the most adventurous propietary > vendor. Then as RMS said, we should remove the feature wholesale, until a solution is found. > So you just decidead that all those versions that allow to distribute > non-free versions of the code are incompatible with the GPL after all? GPL compatibility is not the solution to the problem here, which is a moral one. > Today you are in the mood of picking an argument, aren't you? ;-) I'm not picking an argument, only noting what I found to be confusing.