From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7z5t3yv.fsf@logand.com> References: <87mtfs2ev9.fsf@gmail.com> <874k20vuy4.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87ilqf2j92.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6bpsxxk.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <874k1x7qkw.fsf@gmail.com> <875yljjdvg.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <87pmjrgjpy.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <87r141wrip.fsf@logand.com> <87r141twgw.fsf@logand.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 07 07:55:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nySBZ-00046h-2v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:55:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nySBX-0003uE-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 01:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyS8z-0002ZD-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 01:52:45 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:46088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyS8x-0002i3-NZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 01:52:45 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 11E2B19EFEF; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 07:52:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 27.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290824 Archived-At: On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 06:35, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:37:03PM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> On Mon 06 Jun 2022 at 21:07, wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:55:42PM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> >> On Thu 02 Jun 2022 at 17:37, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> > I can now again access my private gmail account, >> >> >> >> I thought you were forced to use google by your university but I see >> >> that that is not the case. You have a choice. >> >> https://www.stallman.org/google.html >> > >> > This choice would entail losing his job? >> >> Why would he lose his job? > > Because his employer insists on handling job-related mails via gmail? > > See, i've seen several employers: most of them want to keep control > of their work related mails in some way. He said "private": I can now again access my private gmail account, In civilised world, employers do not dictate brands for private stuff. One has a choice.