From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6a2ee981c3: Add new functions for splitting the root window Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:12:52 -0700 Message-ID: <87o7vidiu3.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <166240424802.11417.12502552895310232639@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220905185728.838CEC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <86h71kseiw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87illzmjew.fsf@gnus.org> <868rmvxdvj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87bkrq5bmb.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmg69ifi.fsf@gmail.com> <87h71i3vr3.fsf@gnus.org> <864jxfghcf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfkygokp.fsf@gnus.org> <87r10hg5u7.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <86pmg0v6my.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a674beup.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <86v8psqtj7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87edwfe5lg.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <864jxbw2k7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: Juri Linkov , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Hugo Heagren Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 14 00:14:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oYEAP-0007sI-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:14:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYEAO-00068G-2h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYE9P-0004xb-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:37047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYE9M-0001Nq-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B90A320093A; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:12:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:12:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1663107175; x=1663193575; bh=/rclQmgYX+ PfOFsOMcJk/y9X4IEDHOWTW1p7z2bKpJ8=; b=QjDrmeJbSOMnXBsZIzXmt/X7uc 6vaDsdI4W2udC4l4vU0t7NiNBT8MY7QZmUriMIBgM0cJ3o+fhKHsrAxL3DqVzi4v GbgG3I0jx4gEIuLJqPGp7x6mA4Q3Xe2nkAoG+K3z4q5/FHZGq3+orzyUkqubZDRU G9yqpho+IsRs/zHbaJqYo72+0cUudFj5HhrDKYKCTl4T9oj2/ysg6SRZAovfzP4k bOG4J7yST9ym0ATSPvCJHQwWY3/wQLas8KId+kV4/xkQ+uPOcTdKy35WvXrg/DrQ nhmcqxdu1hIVjrXB6YnPwbhcT+/5SwIc2v/SAfoBn6ipBKd/pMJNAoNL9d2g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1663107175; x=1663193575; bh=/rclQmgYX+PfOFsOMcJk/y9X4IED HOWTW1p7z2bKpJ8=; b=MTbzkQSVTDDDmGSMjlTnU5MO2tUby1K5OjBiv54fYxDk ipFodpy6/pwHvZaqcTtDlNjN/9gmWjpClxE1MgGTGjhZd2M+0Zoj7szDqFZVg9v/ 0S2TQY9tmb6rdFxP2WozhXSOoUT7yoc2x2ijvVOQyzIyMAHwpphvKliYldMZqaQv SupM5zCTYMyO1M/x6Y3DhsQmi7gu66VrWF4dftAZpFEeSeGkCUJsV6Clw/TpR/nU cqxjNzndCeoAIZ4ZLUF0PeP3w/hyGRGeGe5hQyWNr4XSf6Nm8ub97YIB6xPxPNSn ZeKpibQDHfSkG7wrIYKkBGK573gMIdeQ5awGWsQT6Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeduhedgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttddttddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcu hghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffeutedtfedvtdetvefgueefjefggedugfefuddtgeefteek heduvdefjeejieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i23c04076:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:12:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D05897E52B4; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:12:52 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: <864jxbw2k7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2022 21:29:28 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295281 Archived-At: Hello, On Tue 13 Sep 2022 at 09:29PM +03, Juri Linkov wrote: > Since the command name is 'tear-off-window', should it be on > the window-related prefix 'C-x 4' or new 'C-x w'? Nothing under C-x 4 creates new frames, but tear-off-window does, so I think either C-x 5 or C-x w. > What key has the closest mnemonic for detachment? Maybe '^'? Nice! > Then e.g. > > - tear-off-window - C-x w ^ - detach window to a new frame > - tab-window-detach - C-x t ^ w - detach window to a new tab > - tab-detach - C-x t ^ f - detach tab to a new frame My own intuition is that C-x t is for operations *on* tabs, and C-x w for operations *on* windows, so what do you (and others) think about: C-x w ^ f -- tear-off-window C-x w ^ t -- tab-window-detach C-x t ^ -- tab-detach -- Sean Whitton