From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New(?) idea for making backtraces usable: condition-case* Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:59:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7k5954p.fsf@localhost> References: <83ttu27c0w.fsf@gnu.org> <83mszp24hn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 08:00:10 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qMjBR-0003AE-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMjAv-0007LD-Bg; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMjAs-0007Kz-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMjAp-0000oT-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4C0240103 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:59:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1689919167; bh=/nUAVgRBGRX2wctD5oluKlmW6h9w4LqCthBKc5M3VNI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=I8oN+ILX82IoNKIfPLj7Mc4UK/WtJvKMXyEvSk1o3SWiEeSVIXRHIhUrELc5jmQkk bJo+5J0wl3ub36Aq+MepqwNDy4Z+/4dCLxpVZdfWxmWsDe6QdbGFZt7w5c7OlC/c8T w19dWeev2ZOYkUpgzitnW3/9ZygsAP5E3bLBvo0EJNz9UY6fL6i967fT/GXYgxck4H OLMjdWM+fhew5w+sfqRF564QZuYwO3Yqqm5mNDpOcYZ0xqewLcqiAp8SFh27KjTnH1 lP7p/NBGbd1JC20ubwyuEe/mP7aLSSEtjbGOp5hDGxU8x+29UVSZAnLjzirrXs2Fq+ mTNX3EKFZMpNw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R6f5V697Fz9rxg; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:59:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83mszp24hn.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307992 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > We already have that for debug-on-error: the value could be a list of > errors, not just nil or t. I think that one of the legitimate uses that is still not covered is ERT backtraces. ERT wants to do some additional processing, not just throw a backtrace. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at