Re: Pure space

[Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>]

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> And I don't think I care for your hints about my alleged lies.  The
> fact that we disagree doesn't mean that I intentionally tell lies, it
> just means we have different perspectives, different experiences, and
> different responsibilities here.

I think that warrants a separate response: I'm sorry I caused offense
there. I think you're often inconsistent, but I don't believe that means
you're ever lying.

>> IOW, if we count all the complexity and maintenance work that purespace
>> requires as costs of keeping the unexec builds, then we should drop
>> unexec ASAP.
>
> I agree, and urge you to try to convince the single person who so far
> objects to removing unexec, instead of wasting your time on trying to
> change my mind on that.

Indeed, that seems the best way forward.

> I saw no patch attached to the original message (nor any other message
> in this thread).  Am I lying again?

No, this time it's me being inconsistent.  Patch attached (this time,
hopefully).


Pip