From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tony Zorman" <tonyzorman@mailbox.org>,
"Martin Edström" <meedstrom@runbox.eu>,
emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 16:09:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o74hkmzl.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y13l9h4s.fsf@gmail.com> (Suhail Singh's message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2024 11:10:59 -0400")
Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> But if it really is the case that we haven't found the right solution,
>> perhaps we should remove the keyword from the next release, or at least
>> mark it as some kind of an experimental feature?
>
> I have no opinion as to the default behaviour, but having the :vc
> keyword as a builtin is quite useful. It would be unfortunate for it to
> be removed (and a step back IMO, unless some mechansim with equivalent
> functionality is provided).
To clarify, I am not suggesting removing it all together, but if there
is a serious issue regarding the consistency between the
`package-vc-install' command and the :vc keyword for use-package,
especially regarding the question what the correct behaviour for
(use-package ... :vc ...)
should be by default, then it might make sense to "hide" the feature for
now, not enable it by default, remove it from the emacs-30 branch or
just defer the proper addition until Emacs 31.
I tend to agree with Tony that the current approach seems like the best
compromise, but as Eli mentioned it is pretty late to address Martin's
complaint. As such, the only real options I see is to keep everything
as it is or to defer the addition. Personally I am fine with either.
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-14 12:09 Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest Martin Edström
2024-09-19 11:49 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-19 18:50 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-19 20:11 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-19 20:31 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-20 6:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-20 15:14 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-20 15:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-20 16:56 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-20 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-20 20:43 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-21 7:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-21 14:31 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-21 15:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-21 15:43 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-19 21:02 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-20 20:34 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-20 23:38 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-21 7:06 ` chad
2024-09-21 14:27 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-21 15:59 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-21 19:04 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-22 15:30 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-22 20:08 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-25 12:06 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-25 13:15 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-25 12:07 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-25 15:15 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-25 20:11 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-25 20:48 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-29 2:13 ` Richard Stallman
2024-09-29 7:25 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-29 13:55 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-26 23:23 ` Charles Choi
2024-09-27 0:17 ` Adam Porter
2024-09-27 0:33 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-27 6:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-29 14:22 ` Stefan Kangas
2024-09-29 14:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-10-11 18:54 ` Suhail Singh
2024-10-12 5:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-20 4:57 ` Tony Zorman
2024-09-20 19:37 ` Martin Edström
2024-09-20 21:05 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-21 14:44 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-09-21 14:58 ` Tony Zorman
2024-09-21 15:10 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-21 16:09 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-15 17:38 Martin Edström
2024-09-15 18:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-15 19:46 ` Martin Edstrom
2024-09-16 11:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-16 15:24 ` Martin Edström
2024-09-16 16:15 ` Martin Edström
2024-09-16 17:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-18 14:30 ` Martin Edström
2024-09-15 19:52 Martin Edström
2024-09-15 20:41 ` chad
2024-09-15 21:09 ` Martin Edstrom
2024-09-15 22:12 ` chad
2024-09-15 23:51 ` Martin Edstrom
2024-09-16 11:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-16 16:46 ` Martin Edström
2024-09-16 18:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-16 20:16 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-17 11:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-19 3:38 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-19 6:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-19 12:08 ` Suhail Singh
2024-09-19 12:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o74hkmzl.fsf@posteo.net \
--to=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=meedstrom@runbox.eu \
--cc=suhailsingh247@gmail.com \
--cc=tonyzorman@mailbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).