From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers? Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:18:03 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7187t44.fsf@localhost> References: <878qtycdmi.fsf@k-7.ch> <87msgx7yo5.fsf@localhost> <87ttb42i1b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r067cxi6.fsf@localhost> <87y10e6uyf.fsf@localhost> <9d81cb95-8d46-4c51-8daa-d7c8fb44413a@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Juri Linkov , =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Gendre , Org Mode List , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 18 19:17:37 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNyc4-0005ZZ-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:17:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNybH-0001s2-Rw; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:16:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNyb6-0001dx-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:16:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNyb4-0007ee-Qj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:16:36 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB4B240029 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:16:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1734545789; bh=O0yCjfnrhgoiraWL/XF7Vfoi4tpRn0TUMacSH4ds3zM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=jU4TbEd3LRPTsfZE15iCelsi/fVb5yYUC0YAgMTFoUrH5dNAW3X46RyU91CjCTaUo whNHGOvoPX7U10sWBgd0AuxrKKPKo+Y0FsDUkWa7uFp39sWWZENTIVeF1GmjuUhNFz n3YeeNMjKSjQhxCbaIS0KRh484zDCZsMapKOW1n1PnBNYclKl+LcJXx1axon1LBmrs abRB+6oUxdZFBtTYRd+gqoD8aCMrp4lMc2yVGvFkAP5yUQ/psQECL+NQUAp93WRTca LgKrgOSLKL99kR8VNRXvUY40Ucd6IyiqWaVZ1jpaLDY35bsox3n3jTkrNdKC6Lvr5g 5sl1KMJkJV0Yw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YD21m5dcqz6tsb; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:16:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <9d81cb95-8d46-4c51-8daa-d7c8fb44413a@gmx.at> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326681 gmane.emacs.orgmode:164233 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > > (pop-to-buffer BUFFER > > '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-window) > > (reuse-indirect . t))) > > > > 1. If there is a window displaying BUFFER, switch to that window > > 2. If there is a window that is an indirect buffer of BUFFER or that > > shares the same base buffer with BUFFER, switch to that window > > I included the facility that if there is a window whose buffer is the > base buffer of BUFFER use that window. See the attached diff which I > did not test very thoroughly. Thanks! It seems to work, although somewhat different than I described. With your diff, in case (2), if BUFFER is what is passed to `pop-to-buffer' and BUFFER2 is indirectly related buffer displayed in a visible window, then BUFFER2 is replaced with BUFFER. I expected that BUFFER2's window will be selected; nothing more. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at