From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Scrivano Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:52:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87mzo4cv6o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fytzj6a7.fsf@gmail.com> <87pst2h35e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r7dhxenv.fsf@gmail.com> <1122724192.075506.1144.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122728245 31984 80.91.229.2 (30 Jul 2005 12:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 30 14:57:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyqtw-0005Cd-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyqwU-0005YW-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyqw9-0005Ve-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyqw5-0005Tv-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyqw5-0005RG-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.170.201] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dyr18-0007Mu-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so1217112rne for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=m2z2BzLgu1LkUH46fuONJ+qLTcjGbbQYboXA530Or7nHT+IBZh74gsjHUejLP2Y65raePkw1KO3NTbt/6PS0BFPpOXADEFq/Iy+RCKB+N9xyre4hcBkzEzUHvq5hZaifS6/6xmtJxrqeRbRB1jWVyCfpxwgwDjFoQV9YL9Zc1P4= Original-Received: by 10.38.209.26 with SMTP id h26mr1940081rng; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from steel ([80.181.159.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 3sm5835623rnr.2005.07.30.05.52.38; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from gscrivano by steel with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dyqpb-0001mn-Hn; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:52:47 +0200 Original-To: ams@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1122724192.075506.1144.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:49:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41341 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41341 In my opinion it is better to alloc directly MAXPATHLEN+1 bytes when that limit exists without entering the loop and use multiple reallocations. Giuseppe Scrivano