From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 03:18:19 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87mzk0dy9o.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87u0ebg4cb.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132455520 4039 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2005 02:58:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 03:58:27 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdfOI-0002P2-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 03:57:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdfOH-0000bk-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EdfMZ-0008FI-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:55:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EdfMX-0008E1-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdfMX-0008Dw-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EdfMW-0006pf-Aq; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-33-197-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.197]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B901712; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:55:41 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Sascha Wilde In-Reply-To: (Sascha Wilde's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:51:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46312 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61390 Archived-At: [Cc'ed to ding@gnus.org] > I agree, that the correspondence is quite use full, but I also do > agree with Juri, that the slightly different behavior of M-# is > extremely inconvenient. IMO this should be fixed, by making M-# > advance to (like M-u does!). Actually, this is a bug in the the development version of Gnus (but not in the Gnus version in Emacs CVS). It also causes gnus-uu-unmark-thread to fail to unmark the whole thread. That's because gnus-summary-remove-process-mark doesn't return t anymore. The last expression of both gnus-summary-set-process-mark and gnus-summary-remove-process-mark is the call to gnus-summary-update-secondary-mark which explicitly returns t. But in gnus-summary-remove-process-mark this t gets lost due to dolist which returns nil. I think the right fix is to add the return value t as the last expression in gnus-summary-remove-process-mark. Could someone with CVS access to the Gnus repository on gnus.org fix this? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/