From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: QNX subprocess bug Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:03:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87mzf0gor0.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <200604031800.k33I0DAv002355@copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca> <878xqlhs8m.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144242230 13009 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 13:03:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 13:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 05 15:03:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FR7fo-0004Tl-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:03:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FR7fo-0006B1-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FR7fd-00069d-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FR7fb-000681-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FR7fb-00067t-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.110] (helo=tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FR7j0-000775-3l; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.147.51]) by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060405130327.VXMI4713.tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CF07D7946; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:01:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52440 Archived-At: >> I think the best solution is to keep pid_t values (without changing them >> into Lisp_Object values) as long as possible, and to use floats when turning >> them into Lisp_Object. > Thanks Stefan. > This is a change that I have wanted to make for a very long time! > However, I would change the following not-really-Lisp_Object fields as well: Although I did move the `tick' vars, the intention was really to stick to a small patch. But you're right that many more variables can be moved to the non-Lisp_Object part. I just figured that can be moved later on (the only important one for now is the pid). Stefan