From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split man directory Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:57:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87myw2z52h.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188928686 15471 80.91.229.12 (4 Sep 2007 17:58:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 19:58:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IScf3-0007fZ-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:58:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IScf1-0002Rf-NZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IScey-0002RO-De for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IScev-0002QY-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IScev-0002QV-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IScel-0000M3-J6; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from p54A51883.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.165.24.131] (helo=neutrino.caeruleus.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1IScek1Zpw-0007zu; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:57:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:45:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KIOHaPPCSx1EFP6h7jf7Q16pxzyxdR4iRHVb wS2lb6BOraTq6MA8douI0RJE1l+Nh07cv2JuONBB5fysRd1fW4 GZFt178YSQ1d1V0vuK03A== X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77757 Archived-At: * Richard Stallman (2007-09-04) writes: > It's only a directory name, what difference does it make? The "man" > directory is confusingly named, IMO, because it has nothing to do with > the traditional Unix "man" directory. It doesn't even contain sources > for man pages. > > Do others agree it would be better to rename this directory? I do. -- Ralf