From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `with-output-to-string' leaks buffers Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:29:08 +0200 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87myhyixej.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> References: <878wtnlqly.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222190976 13634 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2008 17:29:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 23 19:30:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KiBiT-0001pg-EK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:30:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBhQ-0007eO-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBhM-0007eJ-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBhJ-0007e6-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52047 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBhJ-0007e3-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27]:60388) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiBhI-0008Hc-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623AF1AB2C7; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from elegiac.orebokech.com (home.orebokech.com [82.67.41.165]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A63C1AB34D; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by elegiac.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 661943B195; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:27:11 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104061 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I'd think so, yes. Could you check the users to see if you find > any suspicious use-case? All the users in Emacs use it as intended and do not hold on the buffer, so I installed my changes.