From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:35:27 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87mxy4vmxc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87ocitw2dl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <201003130001.o2D01FFQ003489@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87vdd1yqe4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87eijjzrkd.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <20100317143519.GB4381@muc.de> <87k4t92hmb.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <41FAEDE38E744F0B809E1FBCEF02C4EB@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268981439 19558 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2010 06:50:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:50:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 19 07:50:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsW2M-0005Sb-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:50:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsW2M-0001KF-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsW2G-0001J1-DF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39858 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsW2F-0001IF-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsW2D-0001zJ-C6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsW2D-0001zF-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsW1z-00059l-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:50:03 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.41.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:50:03 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:50:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CqZDiRA4F9lngZ6SBUG3u1XlGCg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122253 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> The reason is that Emacs has two distinct uses for the mark - as a >> mark, and as one end of the region. > > No, no, no. The mark is *ALWAYS* one of the region. By definition. push-mark and pop-mark are not region-centric commands. -- David Kastrup