From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wojciech Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How do I use tags to go to begv_byte instead of BEGV_BYTE? Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:36:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87mxs1no3a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8762yup6tg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxs3rd9l.fsf@gmail.com> <87aao1p72g.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283376990 11108 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 21:36:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Wojciech Meyer , Stefan Monnier , Lennart Borgman , Emacs-Devel devel To: Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 23:36:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oquyl-0002VC-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:36:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oquyk-00037s-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:36:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42583 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oquye-00036S-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oquyd-0002IR-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oquyc-0002IF-Ua; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so6260286wwb.30 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:36:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MWhCwkKfEgfm2koyk55HW8evu+w0C31uVep49cZF7PU=; b=OnaWZElbmHDJKlTuDHf3ziqxBQGhYAh0gcmZpFKSuSbevHEyRJtDuHYd9Nt9XDaai8 a+yGkRbLj9bl0zmKb3ohNRkdI97C+aGR9Q18378bi+bRXyeQFrswNJ0693/KWaKjUjUq SRnS3W/HnNP9Nn3gkn4eOY4ig+jRGU5ieN5cA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LucWeW1mGfQ5DoG1YEAaVTsG5G/dHPpMYghmK/oLO0mV5tuiLSVwOXxsMyORmZdMUK Y/atl8IMJTPetYWPU6l/MOledZXb1xgreKTPYdNn+ggaIA61aiXDod3KbW98ffLUD7LW 67EM92hS5c4BVxBZ41fwln9fxaeeiuw1TZQLI= Original-Received: by 10.227.30.34 with SMTP id s34mr7455060wbc.8.1283376972687; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from spec-desktop.specuu.com (host86-147-138-117.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.138.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v16sm6503810weq.8.2010.09.01.14.36.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:36:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: ("Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC=22's?= message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:57:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129565 Archived-At: Francesco Potort=C3=AC writes: >>BTW: clearly I now see you are a maintainer of `etags' package and I >>should contact you before I posted a patch, but just didn't think >>about it. I might contact you with some more sooner or later. :) > > Don't worry. I am not very active with etags. Fortunately it needs > little work, but nonetheless I have backlogs. By the way, I could use > some help in maintaining it. Thanks. I am willing to improve it and if you have backlogs, please let me know what kind of features, or fixes you would like to see in it. Is it OK to contact you directly? I think also it would be worth to talk to CEDET people. There is also some mode called `OCamlSpot' by Jun Furus, I haven't contacted him yet, but basically what he did specifcally for OCaml *could* potentially reuse `etags.el' interface (and or merging some good things from his work). (and probably, we could generalise etags). Moreover `OCamlSpot' idea could be reused somewhere else, possibly with GCC... (there is `gcc-sense' thing I saw few months ago). Just random ideas. Thanks, and hope to speak to you soon! Wojciech