From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kan-Ru Chen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etc/nxml/*.el duplicate lisp/international/uni-name.el? Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:44:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87mxq9hevs.fsf@anar.kanru.info> References: <877hhgkfdf.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <87k4lfpdrz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871v7milfx.fsf@anar.kanru.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287535826 2257 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2010 00:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:50:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 02:50:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Msg-00069I-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:50:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33987 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8MsZ-0007tz-4E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43955 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8MqZ-00071q-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8MnF-0007cm-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8MnF-0007cb-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8MnB-00051u-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:44:33 +0200 Original-Received: from 118-160-163-40.dynamic.hinet.net ([118.160.163.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:44:33 +0200 Original-Received: from kanru by 118-160-163-40.dynamic.hinet.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:44:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.emacs.devel Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-160-163-40.dynamic.hinet.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4odhS+Ux/sJEP44xxm3+e289uRI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131870 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > We generally don't know. So the best you can do is to make a wild guess > (tho sometimes an internet search can help figure out if something is > used by external packages), then post it here. If noone objects here, > then it may/will get installed and maybe later we'll get complaints > about this change, at which point we may try and adjust the > implementation or accept the problem as an unfortunate consequence. > > In the case of nxml-enabled-unicode-blocks, it may not be necessary to > preserve this customization, depending on what impact it may have. Thank you. Now I can go ahead witch confidence.