From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: changes to cfengine-mode Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:01 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87mxawa2yy.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ipmcgjot.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83lir89gne.fsf@gnu.org> <87aa7ogfo3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwhffv37.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h2ridev.fsf@gnu.org> <8739dfezc1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa7m5a6b.fsf@gnu.org> <877h2oe3yj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h2ngnhb.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87hb1qb9ot.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqg82tdy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqg7x89t.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <8739cwtzh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323791253 10452 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2011 15:47:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 16:47:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUZj-0000Ll-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:47:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54524 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUZj-0005wJ-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUZf-0005w3-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:47:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUZb-0002Q5-QR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:47:23 -0500 Original-Received: from cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com ([208.78.214.25]:64146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaUZb-0002Q1-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:47:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0EAPZx507AqF0N/2dsb2JhbABDrCeBcgEBBAF5EAsNFCUPAQRJDgWHfLYKi2gEiDCSLoxb Original-Received: from unknown (HELO chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com) ([192.168.93.13]) by cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2011 15:47:10 +0000 Original-Received: from internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.29) by chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:12 -0600 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com ([10.2.14.81]) by internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:12 -0600 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:12:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2011 15:47:12.0714 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B1232A0:01CCB9AE] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 208.78.214.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146690 Archived-At: On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:12:04 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> 7) add `cfengine3-parameters-indent' to address some shortcomings in >> indentation. This is a new feature but necessary to fix the lack of a >> hanging indent in the current `cfengine3-mode'. It's very low-risk and >> I hope it's acceptable. SM> BTW, I understand you think it's low-risk, but this will have to wait SM> for 24.2, unless you can come up with a very compelling detailed SM> argument for why it's both low-risk and high-importance. It can wait. Ted