From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET package in Emacs bug tracker Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwzpb8bc.fsf@engster.org> References: <877gquck2s.fsf@engster.org> <1obog6i4hq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350214206 23440 80.91.229.3 (14 Oct 2012 11:30:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 14 13:30:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMOX-0005B4-2Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:30:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54914 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMOQ-0001KC-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMOM-0001Jp-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMOL-0006sk-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17]:46857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMOL-0006r4-5B; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:29:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=MNO9/d2a/bEzgSUy1NiaIcfFI8/4b6yhK2BS/AASlZU=; b=P4HCGCr+BFT6i7TMv1AG86IIaeEFrpu55fQf2Cb/ewFKhRH6/WqTzBAQ63rMRzkXIJEydys48ehvgaVOX1EfYiLfhjKB1rARXf4lxiRq2gnaUhaAwz8w/dwJkmut6Ea5; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-033-238.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.33.238] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMO8-0001Zs-Cm; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:29:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:15:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 83.169.19.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154326 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Another option I should mention is that you can have a "cedet" > pseudo-package if you want. This is basically a package, but with no > maintainer email address. The existing examples are "ns" and "w32". > These have to be used in conjunction with the "emacs" package (it does > not make sense for something to just be in the "ns" package). > Personally, I think these don't add much value over eg simply putting > "ns" in the bug subject. Also, they make it harder to merge bugs. > > But I know the usertag interface is not that well developed, so if you > want a pseudo-package, you can have one. Thanks, but I think I like usertags better. They are more lightweight and feel more natural to me than those pseudo-packages. Also, anyone maintaining a package in Emacs can use them without any action on your part. And as long as I can somehow get a list of bugs tagged as 'cedet' (or by the user 'cedet' - I'm not sure yet what's better), the user interface is fine for me. -David