From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:46:49 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87mwwjcy1y.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8738zf70ep.fsf@riseup.net> <20121222141742.7494b429fe36e5ccef50cf6f@gmail.com> <87d2y2w9j5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqwas0gr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2y2p6d7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sj6xg9p2.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87k3s78hsc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ehi65uv4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hamxndc7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y5g8n4y1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lic8b9ai.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87zk0mktir.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bod1bvhg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <877gnpkq1u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y5g4a1ob.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sj6bg0zj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87obgza7d7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357670836 7861 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2013 18:47:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:47:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 19:47:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCv-0002Lh-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:47:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCf-0002GA-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCc-0002Fx-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:47:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCb-0000rL-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCb-0000rG-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TseCk-00026G-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:47:18 +0100 Original-Received: from c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([65.96.148.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:47:18 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:47:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XpodjBsciPpTGBlsxKNSMRA3seM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156158 Archived-At: On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 02:53:56 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: SJT> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Stefan has confirmed (I believe) the GNU ELPA maintainers will use a >> single "GNU ELPA" key to sign package releases. SJT> Have you given up on having every commit signed? See my summary, posted separately. Short answer: I want to get something usable out, rather than argue. SJT> What bothers me is proposing to impose such costs on the project SJT> without estimating their size, let alone explaining where the SJT> resources will come from. I told you, I'm outsourcing to some Russians I know. Problem solved. Ted