From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Converted git repository available for review Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:39:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwgev75s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20140321200042.236863805FB@snark.thyrsus.com> <20140322092001.GB31376@thyrsus.com> <20140322110331.GA32641@thyrsus.com> <20140324223928.GA29763@thyrsus.com> <87fvm6ww0u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140325105436.GA468@thyrsus.com> <87r45qv8rt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140325113252.GA783@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395747590 22883 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2014 11:39:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eric S. Raymond" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 25 12:40:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPi2-0006on-OP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:39:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41103 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPi2-000387-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPhy-00037o-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPhx-0004F2-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPhx-0004Ex-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55073 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPhx-0003Ry-1i; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE934DF3CE; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:39:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20140325113252.GA783@thyrsus.com> (Eric S. Raymond's message of "Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:32:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170959 Archived-At: "Eric S. Raymond" writes: > David Kastrup : >> Sure, but why should any of that end up on gitorious if gitorious >> already has all the references from the last time you pushed? > > The review1 repo has only had one push. If the sole difference before the next push is a git gc --aggressive, it still won't have a reason to fetch anything. If you did a whole history rewrite invalidating all previous references, things will be different. Though then there is not all that much incentive to using the same repository. -- David Kastrup