From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Aborting display. Is this possible? Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87mw8pr8ei.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20141019141712.GB3197@acm.acm> <83lhoccdv7.fsf@gnu.org> <20141019154255.GC3197@acm.acm> <83egu4c4om.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020110949.GA2947@acm.acm> <8338aidbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020185757.GD2947@acm.acm> <83lhoabl2x.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020210819.GE2947@acm.acm> <87y4s9rgi9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141021105825.GA3035@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413900720 26210 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2014 14:12:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 21 16:11:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaAA-0003Se-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:11:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50675 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaA9-0002m4-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaA3-0002lg-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xga9z-0002h2-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:11:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xga9z-0002gy-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50189 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xga9y-0002Qa-Ga; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E0B3DF6B5; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:04:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20141021105825.GA3035@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:58:25 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175637 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > I've done some more measurements on my system: > > Autorepeat: delay between 1st event and 2nd event: 0.168s. > delay between subsequent consecutive events: 0.024s. That seems rather excessive. Usual I remember is 0.5/0.05, and that already requires good aim. -- David Kastrup