From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master e971ce6: Make autoloads populate a new definition-prefixes table Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:03:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvnbv8zp.fsf@web.de> References: <20160526025822.15529.80475@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160526025822.4D91A220153@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83y46w22gw.fsf@gnu.org> <83twhk1tss.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3copla6.fsf@web.de> <5747ACD9.3090001@cs.ucla.edu> <83shx40zu9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464362860 24024 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2016 15:27:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 17:27:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Jff-0006gz-Eq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:27:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Jfe-00063x-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6JIk-0002n2-VE for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6JIg-0000b8-PK for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:54771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6JIg-0000aq-Ez; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([109.43.3.53]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnjAt-1bjnib21mB-00hsED; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:03:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83shx40zu9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 May 2016 09:39:10 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:B0SRSG8PEyms7O3qNS3fFdknxkCABGjfZRtD5POKe1r/Eu78ec6 I4vJtzSW7ukV16qeJqQxDSOThg4VRPg4cbIN7b2efxE2/u9sjfoIY6AWMuqynjedLwoLa/T uQOtiWjaO3gsdxiQ9X5beXoAt2Tvvhd0QLDtNJJ4OHurciwDs+67urFZm7YgnmhyNLyPCH/ rTWfJfJXZNXVJ7l4k+CGQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:JESKpdVX6Nc=:JKMB5nN9k0p9wkGAExm8+X +Sr4476VkTmoWE/q6lVvdcDG6VpyhFnAAp4oKcqeSe3FHyLgKdnJhVKKWpNEY9gOd86SMiDuF LxaxCGIy3jEEc99tT94YJhcx8u2ciBHNY1lmfGMz9jJRCSFrL/n0MWoRcJFJB5+K9lkAlYFxR EYyLOb3eTZHcjR0LpefqzIE5d4Ujlt6PfEtds7fUKkbZ5PqHsg0Hcalg2bqHiIFDDTcRvqqSH B81Qzv598hZk2MU43VuOURZl7F7BtSYk6ieAT8L1AFZCTsxutSevldfAwiTNQtnQcWDgOt235 HcQF5hvXEmm5M46uaiyuBJwBi1qp4KcE7T8ySXLIH2yfhhumTyHPMfjdXyOX5uWG+BfxG5VZL L8MpnRrTXXxyBrI8IDQxr6ETMZmcabOn2CUZinwqgt6rFYZL/rxWYbZBkh6n7yVDsFGxuJ5LS pgOzFoCHEpQQ7jKm4xggSi01+AXK/+z+JLs/t2/nam9ehXnIwZ9HP4m1ACR+hmk/Yh8BAGGU5 dRsuuJtTVudFmUgmLquG8FGb44fwRj9cis9wTfqF5tjwpAxlJlwWpBLlpihb4Pd+11aw3ahmU 4zo/A8WgaAYviaDNPH3C80P/DzkSAryx3ZOBFikxIvxGrwyWAf7aimMkv+gKSFSDS8800ACD/ +helFXsTT3s1y2/hPkjlk43qXU+xS6/LxHcoMbI84kR2dKWjtIvK6rcbaFcrWl42LGylPEEXd YhgBT7+DBPWSYwT75rRqMlNp6Z4RXe5ZF7d8WwV1FellpKs9T6r0A/CadXueL0JK6AUgJEUL X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204081 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks. Could we please have a more prominent documentation of this > feature? The doc string doesn't actually explain the special > significance of omitting the arglist, except by an indirect hint, and > the ELisp manual says even less. We shouldn't leave these subtleties > unsaid. What do you mean? AFAIU after Paul's fix, omitting the arglist will give you no warnings about the arglist when compiling - as I think is absolutely expected. Michael.