From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from " messages Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:56:43 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87muktbp4k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86sguzc71f.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83y34rc5ns.fsf@gnu.org> <86o95mdd4a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83sguyc4mm.fsf@gnu.org> <868swpdgeg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86k1g5bvr6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87zhp0xss2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86ftqsb0sa.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="116774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 13 23:59:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hFQgM-000UGE-Hn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:59:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFQgL-0008E4-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 17:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFQfV-0008De-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 17:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFQfS-00018p-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 17:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from indri.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.92]:36218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFQfQ-0000nF-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 17:58:33 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jurta@jurta.org Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9845C14E1; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.11.48]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 959EB5C4616; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jurta@jurta.org Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:58:28 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jurta@jurta.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Drop-Reign: 0ea3caa21aaadbcf_1555192708701_2170134645 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1555192708701:4156356232 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1555192708701 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C025837E4; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 14:58:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=linkov.net; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=linkov.net; bh=s1PePZ 7dWZsPfTk530GRYRCsu68=; b=F1/oMg3m2oz12NiaQFiWndPayQWXNAF9+I1B0R k2ZZpk2YN2m0IYnmaa+e891EtZ/kenpUHiSAmJEhObhswX44T9t+8Iqkd9OswRwZ DaOnY37BArn2CqC+OMS2PnXF6L+HFIC6WV4u9aeAgVa15kTsvvfKy0MGBzUe+dBW 7uSdI= Original-Received: from mail.jurta.org (m91-129-111-111.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.111.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jurta@jurta.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48150837E3; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 14:58:25 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a34 In-Reply-To: <86ftqsb0sa.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (Stephen Leake's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:16:37 -0800") X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrvdeigddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffuohhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthekredttderjeenucfhrhhomheplfhurhhiucfnihhnkhhovhcuoehjuhhriheslhhinhhkohhvrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepledurdduvdelrdduuddurdduuddunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdrjhhurhhtrgdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeeluddruddvledrudduuddrudduuddprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheplfhurhhiucfnihhnkhhovhcuoehjuhhriheslhhinhhkohhvrdhnvghtqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjuhhriheslhhinhhkohhvrdhnvghtpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehsthgvphhhvghnpghlvggrkhgvsehsthgvphhhvgdqlhgvrghkvgdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 23.83.209.92 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235412 Archived-At: >>> +--- >>> +** next-error-suppress-locus-message controls when `next-error' >>> + outputs a message about the error locus. >> >> Is this feature really expected to be used often to deserve the new >> defcustom or a simple defvar would be enough? > > If it's a defcustom, it is easier for people to find, if they are > bothered by the verbosity. > >> In any case I recommend to rename it to next-error-verbosity. > > ok. Sorry, I realized only after your commit that a better name would be next-error-verbose. The word =E2=80=9Cverbosity=E2=80=9D usually applies= to customization of the level of verbosity, but I see that you defined a boolean variable for which =E2=80=9Cverbose=E2=80=9D would be more appr= opriate. Also this makes clear that the meaning of its value should be reversed - to show verbose messages when the value is non-nil. But I have no opinio= n about its default value, if you want you can change it from nil to t.