From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding.
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 03:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu6vnlfq.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41f50c98-c3c1-455e-817c-d9cf9e0e3227@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:59:47 -0700 (PDT)")
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> > > RESULT is good enough for Common Lisp. Why isn't
> > > it good enough for Elisp? Just curious.
> >
> > See the discussion in Bug#16206.
>
> I saw it. I still have the same question.
Some people argued that RESULT is not so useful, and it's position in
the syntax is strange, and seems nobody really found this totally wrong.
BTW, in the discussion in said bug report we now found the idea to
always warn about using the RESULT argument in subr.el's dotimes (in
order to remove it later) and fix the warning in cl-dotimes.
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200419004503.26161.91884@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20200419004504.C65772049B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2020-04-19 6:18 ` master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding Juanma Barranquero
2020-04-20 5:10 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-04-20 5:34 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-20 11:06 ` Noam Postavsky
2020-04-20 13:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-20 14:55 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-20 16:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-28 2:14 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-28 2:59 ` Strange compiler warning in `dotimes' (was: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding.) Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-28 15:32 ` master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding Drew Adams
2020-04-29 0:53 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 0:59 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-29 1:13 ` Michael Heerdegen [this message]
2020-04-29 1:23 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-29 2:31 ` Vladimir Sedach
2020-04-29 3:58 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 4:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-29 18:33 ` Vladimir Sedach
2020-04-29 4:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-29 15:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2020-04-30 2:26 ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-16 3:21 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 3:53 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mu6vnlfq.fsf@web.de \
--to=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).