From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Philip K." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Poll: Change xref-show-definitions-function's default? Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 11:24:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtxrtz5n.fsf@posteo.net> References: <9af40a30-8964-3142-aadf-6592605720ec@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 11:24:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kve5W-0006W6-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 11:24:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50868 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kve5V-00055T-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 05:24:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kve4w-0004bT-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 05:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kve4u-000871-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 05:24:09 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F5016005F for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 11:24:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1609583045; bh=JT+qoREcB8WaMGeSK2qI5/wDV+KJBFVdLUnnEqoFgTE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=mGMLYrmRnEPuzWNWnaTeiKzLJUUt6aY1DrhErNckqqFIWh83sKT8jjkMLBjWa+C6c p2v0xYoUA0XLyv6KLPMGSmPzVhb8TpGwV0gdWuYiHm8UNLuGLRArv5bAXZjeAn6OpM JWV8F92IjJSdqlcplttaxC1hSypdFFQmvuY8zAROUwVXEliLYcI5fPrL8a80/oUFY+ NkpfPDb9hTI5RFpku8TgGsaHn0ov8170KMock/rShnuwL0V3/F3Vqc465Cfc0WQBAx 4mDknP5eSowOtDkIXnzf9I5rCalwTutNhoVA0MolMSrFr0DJvfj1DoEPtsxD6NIKAD BYCpKn5NoGVZA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4D7J044D9Nz9rxB; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 11:24:04 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <9af40a30-8964-3142-aadf-6592605720ec@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 29 Dec 2020 20:28:27 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262305 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > Hi all, > > In commit 8c383456291185b029b469061338b5b797a49747 I have done a bit > of cleanup and documented the existing alternative options. I wanted to test it with a few more options, so I tried xref-find-apropos, but that doesn't seem to be affected by chaining the option. Is this intentional? > What do you say we make one of them the default? > > -- Philip K.