From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:12:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87mtwj2djm.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5xurt.fsf@igel.home> <87tuqtxtpw.fsf@igel.home> <83sg6d42o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83im793wbs.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9b7ri3p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20339"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thibaut.verron@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, drew.adams@oracle.com To: rms@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 08:26:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7vVA-0005C5-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:26:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7vVA-0005Nh-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7vHb-0004qd-5F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7vHY-0007mj-BH; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:11:58 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F0B5C009C; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:11:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:11:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=+2PV1TlKMJumkT8LB+7A6FRlVv pR3OH6G4+0jlRVyjg=; b=Sy0NYdRRs5U/C5II/sRdA9HLs2QB63+Oq1skVOBdqq xQP5gCXQX3Z75WbhrlS0bDextuNm4R819kjus3L7/HW/SOZ6Y8z4zSz6ge6GQcVf 6B0z4lugZ0webwDXfneiw+/aLT4lqQuvVQZVGsrRZxUMUnfC/J54Jk7E6LMESYtX SkGRYqW7u8CCGWiZOSH6W9Ga6J/25QzBRgrLrp4qKUUv4YEG3XbjgjeMYSA2B7r+ KyAclTGOrPRT1HIvqDfNDL0/Cc/idezX08d7/4m2IEzwq4bNmNjYJtedTEVofQ5f sXicuaQ4WbfOrzEJ9srwc9haESCrfG1HQnt4SqBJ0dlg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+2PV1T lKMJumkT8LB+7A6FRlVvpR3OH6G4+0jlRVyjg=; b=JiEHDMe9OK7H2k+FJQZgsw INnZNXIJ2hJnmYiGI17OvwoW0faZv1bF3EgXWhSWXO1Xd82T7/MDrJfpuID6syt2 wmIrnauZBhmoT6KyltI+DzkpVSK4yoGzMkT7gR9+qiW2d6tTB3d++CfpMSDMZNsy d0zDgT+WzPMM04HwpTtJIKgOkPueuy05oZVZG37VYkG8lmALumj3yGEQgD4niwPj 8RjtLYl55Hm9N8abFQAX2PdcqRd+lKxEVkAneUV7ishGEGhIZ0fMMOcF2xqt1tG9 D9/zZk9honKSfBV3SPRXOFYU+sr4A2LQ20UKQ1vbmuvXs9ZQruTcf4/jeNSm1xpg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeehgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucgh hhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddvheegfffhffdvfeefhffgjefflefhteevffffkeetgfdt jedtiedvtdevheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263944 Archived-At: Hello, On Fri 05 Feb 2021 at 12:50AM -05, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > > > > > > That many modes have some kind of "revert" action. > > > > > > Aren't they special modes? I think they already have a standard key > > > for that: g. > > > Some of them are special modes, but some aren't. > > That makes me curious; I'd like to understand how come. Can someone > post about modes that have their own revert actions but are not > special modes? *Shell Command Output* from M-! and *Async Command Output* from M-& now have this on master. -- Sean Whitton