From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:39:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87mtq3lvcd.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20210727211521.15408.98852@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210727211523.AE6F72065F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dhabg5s.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgu6h0e1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6m6tn0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1figz3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgu4ri8b.fsf@gnus.org> <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf5oqdem.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8akqd0u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6m4qcg5.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtq4q9s5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnp8m1qy.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0l8q6l8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9998"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, leungbk@mailfence.com, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 30 16:41:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ThV-0002Qx-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:41:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ThU-0004RZ-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9Tfa-00089n-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:39:26 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:60862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9TfZ-0000Lk-0K; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:39:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HoGaGVUGDv+0ltyhLI/MKLVouf8QvEPNw6cP7pPH4wQ=; b=BrRFImZcLSA+Roh9pETybxCkT5 yNwwYAhbdiljLmOkUy76gjO7qkLtMGiUw9G5NDc5EebRuThOCLyMZzP4wblZUt2KMSBAYzcU1bW/y OsUIpwYxR/TQ3QxMRQlYXgEF728gk4tqUh+ybxVwLwhBgV2nYtlaeGhUFnJeTE3/TGoA=; Original-Received: from 2.149.45.105.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.149.45.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9TfP-0000Bf-Uc; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:39:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k0l8q6l8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:22:43 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271851 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Hmm... I rarely bootstrap, so I guess my memories are outdated. But > "years ago" doesn't sound right to me -- could you tell which changes > removed those "Not registering..." messages during the initial build? It was in that never-ending thread on emacs-devel called "Towards a Cleaner Emacs Build"... Which happened in 2019, apparently. > Anyway, if the intent is to fix any such message if and when it > appears, seeing none of them as legitimate, then it's okay to make it > a warning. Yes, I think so. > Which means we are in violent agreement, right? Indeed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no