From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:12:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtlr9kv0.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <87tug4fdn7.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqsp0m7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0gzyy8k.fsf@gnus.org> <835ysjoupv.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nnyob1.fsf@gnus.org> <83y25fneeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmqrx7rh.fsf@gnus.org> <83tug3ndaj.fsf@gnu.org> <874k81vmlf.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfvl8wjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869y0v2.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsrl8owz.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869wkcx.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl298n9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nlwih6.fsf@gnus.org> <837dcx8kkn.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmofl3z.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee745ppw.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl28cnrj.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgps46f3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 13:19:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaCS-0004K7-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:19:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaCR-0003fH-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqa5e-0001cX-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=40712 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqa5d-0002Ut-6n; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:12:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=93+1iINNLrhNBcJwCNhpDVzfNmyy6MJHQEY7QnXAEG4=; b=oVnwK+eQSW+x+VdW2wZ4C4xZ6A MQtmChQGpRdGXqhVyPi3bVuD/yE2Ti4zsfMrFyTbbB/G8Jg1cbIqm8Y2c20XzvWPdSa0E/vZtf4nQ K5+1iBGQ6uoMfRnEp2QvrbbnoRHDTfokiYNGUgdCUIt5W1+ZXCezodO59M9PbzmKq8QE=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqa5X-0004Tb-Gb; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:12:25 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Sylvain Chauveau's _Simple_: "Anthracite" In-Reply-To: <83zgps46f3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:10:56 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280223 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The padding of a string should not depend on whether there's another > string after it. The padding is a display feature: if some Lisp puts > the property on a string, that string should look the same, with the > same padding, regardless of where on the screen it is located, and > regardless of whether there's some text after it. It does look the same, I think? That is, nothingness that comes from a stretch looks like the same like the nothingness that was there before. (But you can tell the difference in buffers if you put the point after it.) >> (If we want to extend the face over the stretch, then this has to be >> done differently.) > > Which face? This feature is not about faces, it is about padding text > so that it takes at least X pixels on display. If there's a face with a background (or the like), you can see the difference between a stretch and no stretch -- you can't otherwise. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no