From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Augusto Stoffel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU] New package: ctrlf and Questions Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 21:59:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtihmh8t.fsf@gmail.com> References: <9631587bddf2ab3b07b60bd4195cc3e1@disroot.org> <87r17tmnzc.fsf@gmail.com> <8735k9jrr2.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12102"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: jflack@disroot.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 23 22:00:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nMykE-0002xk-U2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47340 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMykD-0007i6-SH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMyjX-0006wn-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::62b] (port=40727 helo=mail-ej1-x62b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMyjW-0003OG-8R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id p15so54905633ejc.7 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:59:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=I679Ww5PH0Sv4g+VtuupKzWGQQA1cL7ZfaXRiioujX4=; b=GStkkAp3aZPE1ALRVSaNGlwc6EgKcruC92X2RxWB0Cl8kHmazC7zpALm9JshY5UuDZ x1tvsA7gwpXCwB9BmQE9QnSR0edLf4yQERuYJauEJ6p7SZhbewmaVh7XCA+9rHQJbnfK jfMYa30EJIVQ/kMd09cLp9jf2Z46mP9BWma0DTVPYvxxLnQaQqUvIltCUY+sApD0WfVa /Z1CsbsMZfNfnKIOwwhNpY0PAky+Raj86LS2qsmkl9dYnUZ30vZIjb0sF7oRmTByMYti D1nYShFe0ZCr+wkGXnSU5DFGD/bC7J2AZOgLp6LAAp/+nUpw8ayxQBMCY7hGvcZGMbLT KHbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=I679Ww5PH0Sv4g+VtuupKzWGQQA1cL7ZfaXRiioujX4=; b=V14ilGcuygh5dr0s+gl2QmXCyx0x7Yn9jPnKi7rBLbiUHCvUPdTfaurR9vJg6RShB0 FeFklhiAgTTI99oRgZHsj2GC67DAdhbenE47rGrr3Aswd9gC0FbpdiVN3LPrdMQMTrDc GNVNfkMJ4RMqynuWX59LQlupsyPqAYQq39wkpUEPz9KITMBTx9qdKhI4RK1itbx0Ez1Z rLyXMk/a71DTE05OJDfDRwNDvuqKJ8abEHp7P6dIeowkTZlS6XkAUugnavXFKTPHwyUK 9d8vxMKjP4ZrETmx9S/E3vVwugl4U+hODirETECGHSyEw8o3ap3tZEFx1G33z3SmPKhO si7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sxuxINO4Qyjw3KWpvDqZUkU+9/POo1dpeBi2WOHH6PQT8t6/v XwcgtV5YFtlNuwrUHBEITKF86aaBrzY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgnwE2CAl0Q9q12rrv5WHOgGI1CqIgZPMj2zzYso/Hg7fyKteJk1l5uaTMwKJaj3OsAlqjFw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7d98:b0:6bb:b32b:d3bc with SMTP id v24-20020a1709067d9800b006bbb32bd3bcmr1138005ejo.126.1645649972308; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:59:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ars3 ([2a02:8109:8ac0:56d0::758e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm312132eju.29.2022.02.23.12.59.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8735k9jrr2.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2022 19:40:49 +0000") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::62b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=arstoffel@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286636 Archived-At: On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 19:40, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Augusto Stoffel writes: > >> FWIW, a similar package already exists on ELPA: >> >> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/isearch-mb.html >> >> The main difference to Ctrlf being that isearch-mb integrates with >> isearch instead of reinventing it (and therefore is much smaller than >> Ctrlf). > > Is there any advantage that Ctrlf has over isearch-mb? If not, I don't > see why the more complex package is needed at all? I'm not aware of any advantages (otherwise I could extend isearch-mb or, more likely, isearch itself). OTOH there is nothing wrong with providing (a sensible number of) alternative implementations of the same idea; in fact, isearch-mb was inspired by Ctrlf. So I don't have a strong opinion about this. > >> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 11:56, jflack@disroot.org wrote: >> >>> Greetings emacs-devel. >>> >>> Apologies if these questions have been answered before. >>> >>> I would like to submit a package `ctrlf' [1] for NonGNU ELPA (patch >>> attached). Previously I completed the copyright assignment for Emacs, is >>> a different assignment required for this? >>> >>> Also I have many more packages to submit; is it preferable for me to >>> bulk-attach these patches into a single email? >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/raxod502/ctrlf >> >>