From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: New function ffap-ip-at-point Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87mtd0xoov.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <87r12d5xhv.fsf@gmx.com> <83czdxl7gw.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsit5hh7.fsf@gmx.com> <87wnc56v5k.fsf@gnus.org> <874jz95f1c.fsf@gmx.com> <875yjoaoxq.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7389tff.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , =?utf-8?Q?I=C3=B1igo?= Serna , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 23 09:41:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oF9lT-0006Ko-SC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:41:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oF9lS-0004XA-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 03:41:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oF9jr-0002eb-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 03:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:37481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oF9jp-0007PC-G3; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 03:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LqdVp4svyz1qyJ6; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LqdVp4QLkz1qqkB; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODeVmU7e8ENe; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: cP0RUxKWLA4HDpom/BaAMG4vwZBsXVj7pzQY7yXp7s6fe/re99fj5QFpK9BVC0Qt Original-Received: from tiger.home (ppp-46-244-188-239.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.188.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by tiger.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22823F874E; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:39:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Go on, EMOTE! I was RAISED on thought balloons!! In-Reply-To: <87h7389tff.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:31:16 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.9; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292507 Archived-At: On Jul 23 2022, Robert Pluim wrote: > How far down the rabbit hole do we want to go, knowing that libc has > already done this? Note: "0343.1.2.3" is a valid representation of an > IPv4 address, as is "0", or "1". Or "0xe3010203". -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."