From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `get-file-buffer' be implemented in Elisp? Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:05:00 +0000 Message-ID: <87mszv1xur.fsf@localhost> References: <87pm4r1z03.fsf@localhost> <83fs5n8zaz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23581"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 16 21:05:51 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qL743-0005w2-6Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 21:05:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qL738-0002jZ-UZ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qL737-0002jQ-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qL735-0000yU-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF50240107 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 21:04:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1689534289; bh=fdeQNz0ht+s86IX0R87vh6qTX7ADOLxh6wi6qGVsH5o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=AvDJi9jstH3JWEKGlF+BnOiUjC6z7EABtEgCuxVSHq2xgbANktfOpJtLOBUYFYxvl jNk9ck8oXznXpc0PpyFHkgxw90SEmi3UULWzkhPxiZhzFd9anc+Dd0v7BviHKXzGZj hoIDW7MNv64fbH8yTgp+MQpflgbBWXtx8BOvBs8gwbR6WNZ7BV5ilXsW3D1Ludk2A1 g5QF2BB3fW0EHax2jyBQvjwcyhxgbfs9ZhwMXNE3p6xzTQu+9NnFRyHagQzAtz1py8 ktBYUZZT/FTNyVJ0FYwBJq8nWMdboaHwvQL0Xe3E+6xieDMmWIdi8xFy3CyeUEaO3a xIRbY/jG2VrPg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R3vlz1MDgz9rxN; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 21:04:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83fs5n8zaz.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307900 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> AFAIU, we generally aim to move C functions to Elisp. > > Only when there's a good reason to do so. Interesting. Then, my memory is failing me. I recall being told on emacs-devel that the general direction is to have as many things as possible in Elisp and reduce the C core. I stay corrected. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at