From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making package.el talk over Tor Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87mstzcp72.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <8734ybkqf4.fsf@disroot.org> <87sf54q2t8.fsf@posteo.net> <83o7fql10t.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1e3ygah.fsf@gnu.org> <87sf45m0n2.fsf@posteo.net> <871qbk2avw.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <874jgbc27i.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfy3anh1.fsf@posteo.net> <87tto7vi1y.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <878r5jvda0.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8910"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 24 21:37:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rHVEU-00028e-Jo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:37:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHVDv-0008Lr-29; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 15:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHVDs-0008K0-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 15:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHVDp-0000ct-9Z; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 15:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F7B119E842; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:37:07 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 28.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <878r5jvda0.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314192 Archived-At: On Sun 24 Dec 2023 at 15:19, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Tomas Hlavaty writes: >> iirc emacs using socks proxy did not work for me > > Do you recall what your configuration was. I gave an example earlier on > in this thread, but noticed that url wouldn't redirect all messages over > the SOCKS proxy. I don't remember, it was a long time ago. The configuration I sent is something I figured out at that time and it still works reliably without any changes. It would be nice if it was possible for me to drop privoxy and specify per host/ip proxying rules in emacs directly, but privoxy works well so this has low priority i guess.