From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Encoding issue in the digest (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 240, Issue 25) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87msrk1zw3.fsf@igel.home> References: <71B4DAF4-0C36-40A5-8FF4-6E4B107E5113@protonmail.com> <867ciou6xp.fsf@gnu.org> <2DD5484A-C4DB-47AA-9690-D8C6ED1F0727@protonmail.com> <8634tcu6f2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36826"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "suzume@protonmail.com" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 14:30:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rfK0s-0009Kv-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:30:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfJzg-0004QN-4l; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:29:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfJzV-0004PK-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfJzN-0006s5-Gu; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:28:54 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TlFYV1TQkz1syBs; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TlFYV0v7xz1qqlS; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01khsxk2PCWf; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:45 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: s1DUpRVsPGq7eN7qAxYYkiHKLtSFGdlNeiBWATcoOMsGchJz7a39i6p+Ge9gVWgB Original-Received: from igel.home (aftr-62-216-202-243.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.202.243]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1353F2C1A39; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:28:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:54:34 +0700") X-Yow: I was giving HAIR CUTS to th' SAUCER PEOPLE .. I'm CLEAN!! Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316616 Archived-At: On Feb 28 2024, Yuri Khan wrote: > I think the operative word here is “digest”. The above encoded string > is quoted not from the Subject header field on an individual message > but from the body of a message that combines multiple mailing list > messages. The non-digest message that was received by the mailing list has exactly the same encoded subject header, so the digest context does not change anything here. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."