From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 930c578c104: ; Improvements to PEG documentation Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:39:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87mspn8uzl.fsf@web.de> References: <171323742013.5283.3736155251539337632@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240416031700.9D2B1C1FB45@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87le5dmxuf.fsf@gmx.de> <3800BF0D-113B-44B5-905E-A41B57E8BBB3@gmail.com> <87wmowltel.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87frvk90it.fsf@web.de> <87jzkwlk3i.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y199j5kg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38486"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:iRM8gAeH7sh51hpwlo/lQRJWFGk= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 21 01:39:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ryKIq-0009oa-UY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:39:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryKIB-0007n9-3d; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryKI8-0007mt-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryKI6-0005NM-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:38:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ryKI2-0008ik-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:38:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, THIS_AD=1.043 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317895 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I've fixed this -- I ended up using "anonymous function" instead, > mostly because the sentence was a bit confusing with just "function". Thanks. [ "Function" would have been fine with me, since it would be really surprising if the code would name this ad-hoc constructed function that is useful only once. And it doesn't matter. What matters a bit maybe is the signature of this function - although one can guess it. ] Michael.