From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: yank-media: allow users to limit image types that can be inserted Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:27:06 +0000 Message-ID: <87msiqvkph.fsf@localhost> References: <79fc91f3-c2c3-44db-9817-595808917f26@cas.cat> <86ed5ahb08.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfnywki8.fsf@gmail.com> <86setqfnmq.fsf@gnu.org> <87frpqflv4.fsf@gmail.com> <86ikumfjri.fsf@gnu.org> <877cb2fj0c.fsf@gmail.com> <86cykufhw7.fsf@gnu.org> <3a015d0f-549a-401f-be1c-651c9dbd5d9a@cas.cat> <8634lqfcaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikulwsd6.fsf@gmail.com> <86o74ddzxp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1710"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Visuwesh , pinmacs@cas.cat, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 26 19:26:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4kYJ-0000IO-Hf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:26:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4kXc-0001i2-8B; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4kXY-0001hC-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:25:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4kXW-00006T-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:25:28 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32480240027 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:25:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1729963522; bh=ovzhfuRkGEjuJuVjIGK97ZyUB5U6zm/o50L97tHQMWA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=eY2Hz8JJhMxYRy+8yL3A7LP2yoL0puuFrFAOWDP7YnEJTp/rILVEfjCX9l8tTBdTn 0v2KgzMVTnz/NseoJQK7gfMF61qilaoKO9FlSWBGY96EwtUGiYJmjU4A1SOVYhAbc4 NNSXHNJGmxp2KpW2x9SSRylR5ETboXu+sId2yPhqSSjzxDTgAGdquda1mYK/GF9XGJ PHQvHK0do8oJnEx58QB2hTM1Yp0Riw+3g7VGq8o+SOqtg7orpaIb86AWsfy/oSSDjl v+yBWxXUcMdkajIfmI4vNRqf3ogcIlep+6CmXX+JjZo9E40cwqn1Z0/gHGqhAUSSqP amL+Tym8KsrDQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4XbRPF3hmbz9rxB; Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:25:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <86o74ddzxp.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324853 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> What about a user option yank-media-preferred-mimetypes which is a list >> of mimetypes that the user would like to always opt for, given the >> choice? > > That was proposed earlier in this thread, and I responded: I'm not > sure I understand when and why would this option be needed _as_ a user > option. Does it mean that you are not against an equivalent variable that can be used from Elisp? I think that it might be good enough for Org mode purposes and, if deemed necessary, may be later converted to user option. (It has been over a month since the last activity of this thread, and I want it to go at least somewhere). -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at