From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:12:16 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87lm21pn8f.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> References: <87adpxob2n.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <200206152147.g5FLlfU10992@aztec.santafe.edu> <87bs5r1cyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87hecud8ef.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <87u1gqpyss.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041657141 8930 80.91.224.249 (4 Jan 2003 05:12:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 05:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Ugbc-0002Jt-00 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:12:20 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18UgeY-00015N-00 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:15:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UgYS-0000FC-05 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 00:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UgHp-0007h1-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 23:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UgEN-0007X3-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 23:48:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gci-net.com ([216.183.68.100] helo=gci-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UffY-0005Fr-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 23:12:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [216.183.69.135] (HELO aris) by gci-net.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 5271981 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:11:22 -0700 Original-Received: from johnw by aris with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18UffU-00052r-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:12:16 -0700 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Public-Key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF40524D0 X-Home-Page: http://www.gci-net.com/users/j/johnw/ In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:30:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10452 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10452 >>>>> On Fri Jan 3, Richard writes: > You say that wide-column.el is doing something with > post-command-hook that worked in 21.2 but not in 21.3. Can you > show me what it is doing? Maybe I should change 21.3 so that that > usage works once more. Ah, I understand. Perhaps then I can help you track this difference down. > I assume that in order to form an opinion of that usage you must > first have seen what the usage consists of. So I figure you can > tell me this quickly. Is that not so? It is not so. I merely noticed the slow down, and then systematically disabled module after module until the problem disappeared. Then I re-enabled and dis-enabled, to confirm that the inclusion of wide-column.el would manifest the problem. Once I saw the entry on post-command-hook, I made an assumption, because clearing post-command-hook also causes the problem to go away. I will have to allocate time next week to isolating this problem for you. John