From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 03:45:18 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87llbonyup.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200412211414.iBLEEZ903426@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200412211541.iBLFfBc03861@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103860526 16009 80.91.229.6 (24 Dec 2004 03:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 03:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 24 04:55:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ChgXw-0003O4-00 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 04:55:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ChgiZ-0004qZ-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ChgiR-0004pV-47 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ChgiP-0004pD-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ChgiP-0004p6-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=MXR-4.estpak.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ChgSC-0006WP-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-157-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.157]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7EC10039B; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 05:49:16 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Katsumi Yamaoka In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:31:27 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31359 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31359 Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > You will receive many complaints in the near future. Sigh. Right. The same question is asked in auto-compression-mode during visiting large gzipped files. And what is unusual for such yes-no prompts is that it can't be interrupted with C-g. Typing C-g pops up an unwanted X popup menu. It's better to ask such question outside GC-protected code. Even better not to ask anything, but to display a message saying that to prevent discarding the undo info the user should change the value of undo-outer-limit. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/