From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:32:32 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87lkzi1tn7.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87u0ebg4cb.fsf@jurta.org> <87mzk0dy9o.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132560433 13376 80.91.229.2 (21 Nov 2005 08:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 09:07:11 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6hD-0004Ra-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:06:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6hB-00088t-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:06:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6ON-0006X3-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:47:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6OJ-0006Um-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6OH-0006Tr-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ee6OH-0001U8-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-211-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.211]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9CBC885; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:47:16 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Kevin Greiner In-Reply-To: (Kevin Greiner's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:16:53 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46390 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61399 Archived-At: >> Actually, this is a bug in the the development version of Gnus >> (but not in the Gnus version in Emacs CVS). It also causes >> gnus-uu-unmark-thread to fail to unmark the whole thread. >> >> That's because gnus-summary-remove-process-mark doesn't return t >> anymore. The last expression of both gnus-summary-set-process-mark >> and gnus-summary-remove-process-mark is the call to >> gnus-summary-update-secondary-mark which explicitly returns t. >> But in gnus-summary-remove-process-mark this t gets lost due >> to dolist which returns nil. I think the right fix is to add >> the return value t as the last expression in >> gnus-summary-remove-process-mark. >> >> Could someone with CVS access to the Gnus repository on gnus.org >> fix this? > > Done. Thanks. I've also noticed a difference between gnus-uu-mark-thread and gnus-uu-unmark-thread: gnus-uu-mark-thread keeps point at the same place where it was invoked, but gnus-uu-unmark-thread advances point to the last processed article. Do you think they should behave the same in regard to preserving point after finishing? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/