From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GTK file selector Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:23:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87lkyk62zc.fsf@marant.org> References: <1134552456.439fe58850f31@imp5-g19.free.fr> <878xuma53q.fsf@jurta.org> <17313.37186.344268.487103@parhasard.net> <87d5jxsgib.fsf@jurta.org> <17314.42778.220813.47226@parhasard.net> <17315.7877.155144.973236@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85irtoadgf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134775350 30006 80.91.229.2 (16 Dec 2005 23:22:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 17 00:22:28 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnOtZ-0001Dn-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:21:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnOuH-0005un-IZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnOrl-0003yF-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnOri-0003w4-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:19:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnOri-0003vj-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.27.42.35] (helo=smtp5-g19.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EnOuC-0004r6-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:22:28 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (mol92-4-82-227-97-206.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.97.206]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD6816F46 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:19:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B3D1DA6487; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:23:19 +0100 (CET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <85irtoadgf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:23:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47914 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> Perhaps you're bitter that XEmacs does seemed to have slowed down, >> but please remember this list is for contributing to Emacs >> development, not to knock it down. > > XEmacs at least sports more or less regular releases from their > increasingly stagnant development code base. I think it could be fixed by making bugfix releases as I already proposed many times (I also proposed to add myself as manpower for such a purpose). So far, supporting the current released version is not wanted, as far as I understood. Also, I wonder if the modular design -- separating core and modules -- makes it easier to release often. But, this does not seem to be an open discussion. Regards, --=20 J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Marant