From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completion in GUD buffer Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87lkuwjv0x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <17447.7497.809146.303654@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <873bh4lgme.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17447.27596.415016.280125@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87r74ojxr1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17447.31441.842894.371598@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143438729 30331 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2006 05:52:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 07:52:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNkdx-000174-Qi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:51:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNkdx-0007U1-Di for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNkdc-0007Tt-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNkda-0007Th-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNkda-0007Te-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.188] (helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FNkf1-0004Hp-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.143.15]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060327055133.CADT28586.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3366D734A; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:51:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17447.31441.842894.371598@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:40:33 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52081 Archived-At: >> > That part is a bug. What I mean is do we want the user to able to select >> > the completions window like before, or do we only want to allow him to >> > select an item in the window with mouse-2? >> >> I don't see from the ChangeLog how the mentioned patch would have such >> a consequence on the behavior of completion, so I suspect that once we've >> fixed the bug, the question will disappear. > At first glance comint-dynamic-simple-complete is a candidate (just because > its got the word complete in it). If I evaluate comint.el.~1.294~ and > comint-update-fence from current comint.el and run current M-x gdb I see > current behaviour. If I evaluate comint.el.~1.293~ and comint-update-fence > from current comint.el and run current M-x gdb I see the old behaviour. > I think I'm looking at the right ChangeLog entry. I'll explore further. Sorry, I meant to say that the log entry doesn't indicate that the change in behavior was intended. Which is why fixing the bug will probably answer the question as well. Stefan