From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Problem report #8
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:38 -0400
Message-ID: <87lkuesl99.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144604273 4562 80.91.229.2 (9 Apr 2006 17:37:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 17:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 09 19:37:51 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSdrA-0003OD-Sr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:37:49 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSdrA-0001ts-7m
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:48 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSdqx-0001te-3J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:35 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSdqv-0001tR-FD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSdqv-0001tO-9i
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [18.19.6.82] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FSdvN-0002h8-UG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:42:09 -0400
Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BD1AF1207DA; Sun,  9 Apr 2006 13:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> (Dan
	Nicolaescu's message of "Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:59:18 -0700")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52562
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52562>

Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> writes:

> I signed up to see the Coverity problem reports. 
> RMS asked me to post a few here.
> There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs
> in emacs.

Just to be clear: are the bug reports you posted to this list the ones
that you found to be not bugs, or the ones that you have not analyzed?