From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:39:40 +0900 Message-ID: <87ljffqvwz.fsf@xemacs.org> References: <27349166.post@talk.nabble.com> <83bpge50k5.fsf@gnu.org> <87vdem8gly.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87k4v1xm4l.fsf@gmail.com> <83sk9prvnd.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4v1vz5f.fsf@gmail.com> <83eil8sn5b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264876074 31913 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2010 18:27:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , paul.r.ml@gmail.com, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 30 19:27:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbI2u-0003Ru-GQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:27:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbI2t-000172-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:27:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbI2o-00016P-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56228 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbI2o-00016B-Aj for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbI2i-00045Y-9a for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:35653) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbI2h-00045C-HS; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:27:35 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E37FFA; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:27:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A08D2120643; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:39:40 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120712 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Given that there's no other Elisp implementation that I know of, if you > want to use one of the existing language implementations to replace > Emacs's own code... Eh? I think Miles might also , too .... And Mike Sperber and students, for that matter. There's also librepl, used in the sawfish window manager for X11, which was deliberately modeled on Elisp. Obviously the domain- specific functions will differ, but the Lisp environment was indeed similar.